LogoQDD Actuator
Start inquiry
LogoQDD Actuator
WhatsApp
LogoQDD Actuator

Shenzhen and Dongguan QDD actuator factory network supporting robot joint selection, prototype validation, sample review, and B2B export delivery.

Inquiry Email

[email protected]

Email app

Include robot type, joint location, torque/speed/voltage targets, quantity, and destination.

Instant Chat

+86 18857971991

Chat on WhatsApp

Send QDD actuator specs, STEP files, or actuator references for engineering review.

Products
  • QDD Robot Actuators
  • Backdrivable Actuators
  • Hollow-Shaft QDD Actuators
  • All Products
Solutions
  • Quadruped Robots
  • Humanoid Lower Limbs
  • Exoskeletons
  • All Applications
OEM Capabilities
  • Custom QDD Actuator
  • Prototype to Production
  • Private-Label Actuators
  • OEM Hub
Engineering
  • QDD Explained
  • QDD vs Harmonic Drive
  • Thermal Sizing
  • All Engineering Resources
  • QDD Actuator Blog
  • Buyer Resources
Resources
  • CAD / Datasheet Library
  • Developer Support
  • Compliance Documents
  • About
  • Manufacturing Network
  • Contact / RFQ
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 QDD Actuator. All Rights Reserved.|Direct QDD actuator RFQ: [email protected] | WhatsApp +86 18857971991 | LinkedIn contact.
Backed by Linkup Ai Co., Ltd. Manufacturing delivered by the Advanced Manufacturing Division of Linkup Precision.|Legal entity: Linkup Ai Co., Ltd.
105Nm QDD Actuator Hub

105Nm Quasi Direct Drive Actuator

High-torque-density 105Nm quasi-direct-drive (QDD) actuator module with low reflected inertia, high impact resistance, and active force control for humanoid robot joints and legged platforms.

Hybrid Mode105 Nm peak screening with interactive load match and RFQ caveats.

Page last updated July 28, 2026. Source review combines supplier baseline data with public QDD architecture references.

Use Sizing Tool Request RFQ
105 Nm quasi direct drive actuator module for humanoid and legged robot joints
105 Nm quasi direct drive actuator module for humanoid and legged robot joints
1. Sizing Tool2. Mechanical Overview3. Torque-Speed Curve4. Impact Flow5. Design Comparison6. Technical Parameters7. Screening Scenarios8. QA & FAQ9. Sources

105Nm QDD Actuator Joint Sizing Tool

Simulate humanoids and quadruped leg kinematics to calculate peak load matches.

1. Input Robot Configurations

Robot Geometry Layout
Target Joint Location
35 kg
15 kg150 kg
0.3 m
0.15 m0.80 m
locomotion gait dynamics
Dynamic factors scale the gravity load vector to account for inertia during acceleration.
Driver DC Bus Voltage

2. Calculation & Safety Match

Peak Joint Torque Required103 Nm
Optimal Match
Safety Factor Matrix1.02x (105Nm limit)
Reflected Inertia (J_ref)0.0416 kg·m²
Backdrive Impedance< 0.58 Nm
Thermal Headroom2% remaining
Method assumptions
  • Peak torque = mass x 9.81 x lever x dynamic factor x joint coefficient / support-leg count.
  • Support-leg count defaults to 2 for humanoids and 4 for quadrupeds; single-leg stance, stairs, and jumps need multibody simulation.
  • 105 Nm is a peak-pulse screen. Continuous gait acceptance should use the 35 Nm RMS thermal baseline and buyer-specific heat-sink design.
Actuator Sizing Verdict:

Good first-pass match under the selected load assumptions. Validate trajectory peaks, frame heat sinking, and software current limits before prototype release.

Request CAD / Sizing Sheet Review

Contact: [email protected] | WhatsApp +86 18857971991

Core Value Proposition

Key Performance Conclusions & Metric Summary

Treat these figures as RFQ screening targets. Public sources support the QDD design rationale, while QDD-105-specific values should be confirmed with a signed datasheet, CAD package, thermal log, and dynamometer report before design freeze.

Torque Density

42.8 Nm/kg

Supplier baseline peak density using the 105 Nm pulse target and 2.45 kg module mass.

Reflected Inertia

0.052 kg·m²

Low 8:1 ratio screen for mechanical transparency and impact backdrivability.

Thermal Continuous

35 Nm RMS

Continuous-screening baseline for gait RMS torque with frame heat sinking.

Commutation Bandwidth

20 kHz FOC

Driver target for current control; confirm firmware loop rates by quoted batch.

Visual Evidence & Assembly

Engineering Diagrams & Mathematical Models

Review the mechanical assembly, speed boundaries, and backdrivability energy absorption path of our 105Nm actuator module.

1. Mechanical Cross-Section

Schematic highlighting outer-rotor PMSM motor, 8:1 planetary planet carrier, and hollow wiring bore.

Rotor MagnetsStator Windings15mm Hollow Bore8:1 Planetary GearOutput Flange
Figure 1.1: Standard 105Nm QDD envelope with dual absolute encoders.

2. Torque-Speed Winding Envelope

Winding capabilities illustrating peak torque saturation vs continuous operation.

Speed (RPM)Torque (Nm)035105180270Continuous (35Nm)Peak Pulse Limit (105Nm)
Figure 1.2: Dynamic operating limits showing thermal voltage limits.

3. Shock Impact Absorption Flow

Mechanism showing how mechanical landing impact is backfed into driver capacitors.

Foot Strike (2,400N)8:1 Planetary BackdriveStator GenBus CapRegenerative current
Figure 1.3: Regeneration loop saving planetary gears from shear cracks.
Comparative Sizing

Actuator Architecture Comparison & Specifications

Toggle options below to evaluate detailed actuator configurations, comparative benchmarks, and dynamic operating boundaries.

ParameterStandard 105Nm QDD ValueWhy It Matters for Legged Sizing
Peak Torque Rating105 Nm (at 45A peak current)Defines structural payload capacity during dynamic lunges and jumps.
Continuous Torque35 Nm (RMS gait stable limit)Limits continuous walking distance before motor windings trip on heat warning.
Planetary Gear Ratio8:1 Planetary reduction (single stage)Maintains dynamic transparency, backdrivability, and minimal friction loss.
Reflected Inertia0.052 kg·m²Low value allows mechanical compliance to absorb landing shocks instantly.
Backlash Angle3–5 arcminutes (0.05° - 0.08° output drift)Controls standing posture precision and high-frequency force stabilization.
Integrated DriverField Oriented Control (FOC) driver cardRuns current loops at 20kHz for dynamic torque vector estimation.

Thermal Operating Envelope & Duty Cycles

Load CaseOutput TorqueHeating RateAmbient / Time Limit
Static Standby (Holding static posture)15 Nm<0.04°C/sContinuous screen with validated heat pathUp to 55°C (assuming active aluminum chassis heat-sinking)
Continuous Trot / Regular walk gait35 Nm~0.22°C/sContinuous (Stabilized at 78°C)Max 25°C ambient (Without heatsink: derates to 25Nm continuous)
Peak Acceleration / High dynamic jump75 Nm~0.68°C/s35 seconds (to 105°C winding)Requires recovery phase; triggers 110°C software derating
Impact Landing absorption / Emergency stop105 Nm~1.42°C/s4.8 seconds (Pulse burst limit)Absolute hardware limit; active FOC thermal compensation required
Engineering Specifications

Detailed Technical Parameters & Material Options

Review the factory calibration tolerances, housing materials thermal dissipation, and planetary efficiency under load.

Procurement note: Treat actuator-specific limits below as supplier screening targets until the quoted batch is matched to a signed datasheet, inspection report, and thermal duty-cycle log.

Housing Materials & Thermal Conductance

Material GradeYield StrengthThermal Conductance
Al7075-T6 Aerospace Aluminum (ASTM B209 Std)503 MPa130 W/m·K (Best heat conduction)
Ti-6Al-4V Grade 5 Titanium (ASTM B348 OEM option)880 MPa6.7 W/m·K (Poor heat conduction)
CFRP Carbon Fiber Housing (T700 Carbon Fiber OEM option)~650 MPa (Transverse: 150 MPa)< 5.0 W/m·K (Needs thermal core inserts)

Factory Dynamic Calibration & QC Standards

QC Test SweepsRejection LimitMeasurement Method
Planetary Gear Backlash Drift< 5.0 arcmin targetBidirectional locking dynamometer torque loop sweep
Dynamic Torque Ripple (Cogging)< 1.4% of peak torque target19-bit FOC motor phase current online feedforward compensation
Thermal Estimator Accuracy±1.5% of absolute winding temp targetPT1000 RTD sensor readout calibration vs current-integration estimator

Planetary Gearbox Mechanical Efficiency Map

Load ConditionMechanical EfficiencyStabilized Lubricant TempDominant Losses Factor
Continuous Walk / Nominal (35 Nm @ 120 RPM)91.8%55°C (Steady state)Optimal synthetic grease shear viscosity
High Speed Run / Low Load (12 Nm @ 220 RPM)87.2%42°CFluid dragging losses dominating over tooth pressure
Peak Impact Landing / High Load (105 Nm @ 30 RPM)84.5%85°C (Short duration transient)Extreme tooth contact pressure reducing fluid film thickness

Planetary Gearbox Metallurgy & Case-Hardening Standards

Alloy Steel GradeHeat TreatmentSurface HardnessUltimate Tensile
18CrNiMo7-6 (EN 10084 / 1.6587)Gas carburized & ground (case depth 0.6-0.9 mm)58–62 HRC (Root) / 60–64 HRC (Flank)1,200 MPa
20CrMnTi (GB/T 3077 / 20MnCr5 EN)Carbonitrided & shaved56–60 HRC (Root) / 58–62 HRC (Flank)980 MPa
40CrNiMoA (AISI 4340)Quenched & Tempered (Through-hardened)32–38 HRC1,100 MPa
Metallurgical Impact: High case depth (0.6–0.9 mm) combined with root grinding minimizes dynamic fatigue and root shear under peak torque spikes (105 Nm).

Tribology & Precision Joint Lubricants

Lubricant BrandBase Oil & ThickenerOperating TempNLGI Class & Advantage
Kyodo Yushi Molywhite RE No. 00Synthetic Hydrocarbon (PAO) + Lithium soap-40°C to +130°CSemi-fluid (NLGI 00) - Extremely high load, anti-fretting under micro-oscillations
Klüber Microlube GB 00Mineral base oil + Sodium soap-20°C to +100°CSemi-fluid (NLGI 000) - High structural stability, excellent NBR elastomer compatibility
Mobilith SHC 220Synthetic ester/PAO + Lithium complex-40°C to +150°CNLGI 2 (Standard Grease) - Superior water-washout resistance, good for outdoor field quadrupeds
Tribology Note: Semi-fluid NLGI 00 grease prevents channeling effects in compact planetary systems, ensuring 100% wet lubrication on sun-and-planet gear tooth meshes at startup.
Application Screening

Humanoid & Legged Robotics Sizing Scenarios

Use these modeled scenarios to shape an RFQ and validation plan. They are not published customer deployments or third-party lab reports.

01

35 kg Humanoid Knee / Hip Pitch Screening Scenario

Premise: A biped humanoid in the public mid-size class needs a first-pass knee or hip-pitch actuator shortlist before detailed multibody simulation.

Process: Model the joint with 35 kg total robot mass, 0.35-0.40 m lever length, 2.0-3.2G dynamic factor, and 48 V bus assumptions, then compare peak demand against 105 Nm pulse torque and 35 Nm RMS thermal baseline.

Screening Outcome: Screening outcome: the QDD-105 class can be shortlisted when the duty-cycle RMS torque stays below the continuous baseline. Landing, stair, and jump cases still require prototype thermal logs and gearbox shock validation.
02

50 kg Quadruped Hip / Knee Outdoor Duty Screening

Premise: An inspection quadruped must choose between a compact 105 Nm QDD module and a heavier actuator for rough outdoor gait cycles.

Process: Use the calculator with quadruped load sharing, 0.30-0.45 m limb geometry, 2.0G regular gait factors, and a chassis heat-sink assumption, then check whether the RMS joint torque remains near the 35 Nm continuous screen.

Screening Outcome: Screening outcome: the actuator is plausible for prototype review when the frame can remove heat from the stator housing. Desert-temperature or sealed-leg designs need derating data before procurement.
03

Wearable Rehabilitation Exoskeleton Backdrive Screening

Premise: A lower-limb exoskeleton needs high backdrivability and a low perceived resistance target before safety testing with users.

Process: Evaluate the 8:1 planetary configuration as a low-impedance candidate, then specify an output-side torque sensor or dynamometer validation plan for patient-facing risk controls.

Screening Outcome: Screening outcome: low-ratio QDD architecture is worth a prototype test, but comfort and safety claims must come from the buyer’s medical-device validation protocol, not from this calculator.
04

Collaborative Arm Torque-Estimation Architecture Screening

Premise: A cobot shoulder or base joint needs a compact, backdrivable torque source while keeping the collision-detection architecture auditable.

Process: Compare motor-current torque estimation against an architecture with a dedicated output torque sensor, then define the required response-time test before selecting the integrated driver option.

Screening Outcome: Screening outcome: integrated current-based estimation can reduce wiring and BOM complexity, but safety-rated collision detection still needs application-specific validation and documented fault handling.
FAQ & Support

Buyer Technical Q&A & Support Reference

Technical answers regarding mechanical backdrivability, electrical bus protocols, and thermal sizing tolerances.

Why is low reflected inertia critical for legged/humanoid robots?

Reflected inertia is proportional to the square of the gear reduction ratio. In high-ratio harmonic systems (e.g., 100:1), motor inertia is multiplied by 10,000, creating a highly rigid joint that transfers external impact shocks directly to the gears, causing tooth breakage. In our 105Nm QDD actuator (8:1 planetary ratio), motor inertia is only multiplied by 64, allowing the joint to rotate backward (backdrive) and absorb shock forces mechanically.

What gear steel grade is used in the planetary reducer of the 105Nm module?

We use high-purity aerospace alloy steel (18CrNiMo7-6) with precise carburizing and tooth profiling modification. The tooth root thickness is increased with a 22.5° pressure angle, doubling bending fatigue strength under impact loading compared to standard industrial gears.

How does the 105Nm QDD handle backlash degradation over time?

The standard design target uses planetary preload, hardened gear surfaces, and dual-encoder compensation to keep initial backlash in the 3-5 arcmin class. Treat long-term backlash drift as an RFQ validation item: request the supplier endurance log for your torque spectrum before locking the joint design.

Is the 15mm hollow shaft bore customizable?

Yes, the standard version has a 15mm clear through-bore. We can customize this up to 20mm for route-heavy joints, but this reduces internal bearing dimensions. Contact engineering to review radial and axial load capacity changes.

Can this QDD actuator operate reliably in force control without an external torque sensor?

It can be screened for current-based torque estimation because the low-ratio planetary stage keeps friction and reflected inertia lower than high-ratio gearboxes. For safety-rated force control, validate the current-to-output-torque model with a dynamometer or add an output torque sensor.

What is the purpose of the dual-absolute encoder setup?

The motor-side encoder (19-bit magnetic) operates high-speed FOC current commutation. The output load-side encoder (19-bit absolute) measures actual joint angles. This allows the driver to correct for planetary backlash, tooth deflection under load, and mechanical joint compliance in real-time.

What communication protocols does the integrated driver support?

The integrated driver supports EtherCAT (CoE, up to 2.0 kHz loop rate) and CAN-FD (up to 1.0 kHz loop rate) out-of-the-box. RS-485 is available for simple non-dynamic auxiliary axes.

How do you handle torque ripple (cogging torque) at low speeds?

By using fractional-slot concentrated windings and stator skewing combined with active harmonic current injection (5th and 7th order slot harmonics compensation) in the driver firmware. This keeps torque ripple under 1.4% of peak ratings.

How does high winding temperature affect joint performance?

High winding temperatures increase stator copper resistance. From 20°C to 110°C, the motor torque constant (Kt) drops by roughly 11%. The driver firmware continuously estimates winding temperature and compensates current gains to maintain torque output stability.

What is the thermal shutdown limit and safety threshold?

Winding temperature safety warning triggers at 95°C. At 110°C, the driver initiates automatic linear current derating (4% torque reduction per °C). At 125°C, bridge MOSFETs enter over-temperature shutdown to protect coil insulation from degradation.

How do I calculate the thermal headroom for my gait duty cycles?

Calculate the Root Mean Square (RMS) torque of your movement loop. As long as the RMS torque is within the continuous thermal limit of 35 Nm (mounted to a standard aluminum heatsink frame at 25°C ambient), the joint temperature will stabilize below 80°C.

Does the actuator support liquid cooling paths?

We offer an optional liquid cooling jacket housing customization (OEM) for heavy payload humanoids. Under liquid cooling, the continuous torque threshold increases from 35 Nm to 52 Nm due to accelerated heat dissipation.

How does winding temperature rise affect the motor torque constant (Kt) and how is it compensated?

As stator coil temperature rises from 20°C to 110°C, the torque constant (Kt) drops by ~11.5% due to the increased resistance of the copper wire and the temperature-dependent reduction in magnetic flux density of the NdFeB magnets. To mitigate this torque fade, the integrated FOC driver executes real-time compensation via a software-based thermal model. By calculating winding resistance using phase current integration and correcting the FOC q-axis current gain dynamically, torque linearity is maintained within ±1.5%.

Which FOC controller chip architecture drives the integrated inverter, and what is the current control bandwidth?

The integrated driver is specified around a Cortex-M4-class FOC controller with a 20 kHz current-loop target. Exact MCU, firmware loop rates, and disturbance-response timing should be confirmed from the signed BOM and firmware release notes for the batch quoted.

What is the backlash drift expectation under continuous humanoid walking cycles?

Initial factory-cleared backlash is targeted in the 3-5 arcmin range. Drift depends on torque spectrum, lubrication, shock loading, temperature, and sealing, so continuous-walking endurance should be accepted only against a buyer-specific test profile and inspection interval.

What happens if the absolute encoder loses magnetic sync or experiences strong interference?

The dual-encoder safety architecture allows the driver to fall back to the motor-side incremental/hall states for emergency commutation, immediately throwing a safety fault to the master EtherCAT/CAN controller. This prevents dangerous high-speed runaway and allows a controlled compliant stop.

Engineering Sizing Disclaimer & Safety Warning:The output joint calculations and torque estimates generated by this simulator are for initial design evaluation and baseline scoping only. Actual dynamic joint behavior will vary depending on payload fluctuations, walking gait trajectory profiles, mechanical linkage deformation, and ambient thermal conditions. Data extrapolations for loads above 120Nm are unverified (supplier-confirmed data required). Robotics R&D teams must perform dynamic multibody physical simulations and physical prototype testing under thermal load before finalized volume design sign-off.

RFQ Procurement Checklist & Lead Time Sizing

Include the following requirements in your RFQ email to receive CAD files, pricing, and sample availability after engineering review.

Required Procurement Details

  • Dynamic Load Cycle: Target acceleration profiles, continuous payload mass, and leg layout geometry STEP reference.
  • Interface Requirements: Customized shaft dimensions, output flange layout configurations, and connector directions.
  • Protocol Choice: Driver communication selection (EtherCAT default, CAN-FD standard) and winding voltage supply (48V default).
  • Commercial Volume: Initial prototype quantity target (typically 2-6 samples) and projected annual production runs.

Standard Factory Lead Times

  • Standard QDD-105-9 Prototypes7–12 Business Days
  • Custom OEM Shaft/Winding modifications15–20 Business Days
  • Standard Air Freight Shipment3–5 Business Days (Global)
  • Sample Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ)1 Unit (no sample bounds)

Contact Engineering & Request Quotation (RFQ)

Inquiry Email

[email protected]

Email app

Include robot type, joint location, torque/speed/voltage targets, quantity, and destination.

Instant Chat

+86 18857971991

Chat on WhatsApp

Send QDD actuator specs, STEP files, or actuator references for engineering review.

Related Decision Paths

Continue the 105Nm QDD Actuator Review

Use these same-site resources to compare QDD architecture, humanoid lower-limb fit, low-ratio planetary trade-offs, and OEM customization requirements before sending the RFQ.

QDD Actuator Technology GuideContinue this 105 Nm actuator screen into the linked engineering or RFQ workflow.Humanoid Lower-Limb Joint IntegrationContinue this 105 Nm actuator screen into the linked engineering or RFQ workflow.Custom QDD Actuator OEM PageContinue this 105 Nm actuator screen into the linked engineering or RFQ workflow.Contact for RFQ & CustomizationsContinue this 105 Nm actuator screen into the linked engineering or RFQ workflow.QDD Robot ActuatorsCompare the broader QDD robot actuator family by torque class.Backdrivable ActuatorsReview why low reflected inertia and backdrivability matter for impact-prone joints.Low-Ratio Planetary ActuatorsEvaluate low-ratio planetary gear trade-offs against high-ratio reducers.

Data Sources & Evidence Ledger

This hybrid page combines public QDD design references, supplier baseline values, and standards-based risk framing. Public sources do not independently certify every QDD-105 value on this page; request signed datasheets and test reports during RFQ. Source review date: July 28, 2026.

Ref [01]

QDD-105 supplier engineering baseline and RFQ datasheet request

Reviewed July 28, 2026 · Supplier baseline; request signed datasheet and test logs

Scope: 105 Nm peak torque, 35 Nm RMS thermal baseline, 2.45 kg module mass, ratio options, lead-time, and customization figures are on-page supplier baseline values, not independent public certification.

Ref [02]Unitree G1 official product overview

Access checked July 28, 2026 · Public robot-class benchmark

Scope: Used only to anchor humanoid size-class context for legged robot joint requirements; it does not validate QDD-105 actuator specifications.

Ref [03]CubeMars AKE-series quasi-direct-drive actuator catalog

Access checked July 28, 2026 · Public supplier-family benchmark

Scope: Used as a cross-check for common QDD architecture patterns such as low-ratio planetary reduction and integrated motor-driver packaging, not as proof of QDD-105 lifetime claims.

Ref [04]MIT Biomimetic Robotics Lab, proprioceptive actuator and Cheetah actuator publications

Reference reviewed July 28, 2026 · Academic design rationale

Scope: Supports the engineering rationale that low reflected inertia and backdrivability matter for dynamic legged locomotion; it does not certify this supplier module.

Ref [05]ISO 6336 gear rating standard family

Reference reviewed July 28, 2026 · Standards framework

Scope: Used as the standards family for gear rating terminology and fatigue-risk framing; final tooth safety factors require the signed gearbox drawing and material certificate.